S u m m a r y
Puget Sound Tsunami/Landslide Workshop
January 23 and 24, 2001
Washington State Military Department
Emergency Management Division
National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration
United States Geological Survey
Washington State Military Department
Camp Murray, WA 98340-0149
NOAA/Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory
7600 Sand Point Way NE, Bldg. 3
Seattle, WA 98115-6349
|Day 1: Programmatic Sessions||5|
|Day 2: Technical Sessions||18|
|Merged Bathy/Topo Digital Elevation Model||21|
|List of Acronyms||24|
The Washington State Military Department Emergency Management Division (EMD) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) sponsored a two-day Puget Sound Tsunami/Landslide Workshop held at the NOAA/Western Regional Center in Seattle on January 23 through 24, 2001. The workshop is part of ongoing work by the emergency management and scientific communities to forge a partnership to address tsunami and landslide hazards in the Puget Sound region. More than 120 emergency management professionals, scientists, engineers and interested public attended the workshop. The workshop was funded through a Tsunami Mitigation grant to EMD to provide emergency preparedness planning support to Washington state. NOAA provided the facility and technical support, funded in part by the National Tsunami Hazard Mitigation Program.
The organizers primary goal for the workshop was to provide a forum for discussing the current level of understanding of tsunami and landslide hazards in Puget Sound. Because this understanding has scientific, geotechnical, public policy and emergency response components, the workshop presented these issues in an interdisciplinary forum. The workshop goals were:
-Integrate tsunami research in Puget Sound.
-Move research results to communities.
-Educate public and local officials in how to respond.
-Make products developed by any part of tsunami community widely available
The workshop was structured into programmatic sessions (Day 1) and technical sessions (Day 2). Each session served a separate purpose. The programmatic sessions were divided into a morning series of presentations on mitigation planning, including the following:
An afternoon tutorial focused on reducing hazards in Northwest hot spots. It included basics on Puget Sound:
The Technical Sessions (Day 2) offered panel discussions delivered by technical experts in several active areas of mitigation product development. The topics covered current research on the following:
Day 1: Programmatic Sessions
George Crawford, Washington State Emergency Management division (EMD) Earthquake Program
Eddie Bernard, Director NOAA and Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory and Chair of National Tsunami Hazard Mitigation Program
Trudy Winterfield, Director of Cowlitz County Emergency Management and Vice Chair Washington State Emergency Management Council
The purpose of the workshop was to bring together the scientific and planning communities to find ways to better defend against tsunami and landslide hazards. We face hazards on a daily basis. Among the lessons weve learned¾ including that of the Aldercrest landslide near Kelso, Washington¾ is the importance of the inter-relationships among programs. Puget Sound tsunamis will have no warning, making outreach and warning guidance critical. Much work has been done. Tools for emergency managers now include databases on more than a 100 coastal communities, inundation maps, evacuation routes and surveys.
Understanding ongoing research is another tool that emergency managers can use to build disaster-resistant communities.
Moderator: Chuck Hagerhjelm EMD
State Hazard Mitigation
Marty Best (EMD)
All local communities must identify and assess mitigation. Typically, communities do so as part of their normal Capital Improvement Planning (CIP) or Growth Management Planning processes. They dont, however, recognize CIP or GMA as the mitigation planning tool it is. Every community in the state is required by the GMA to update their comprehensive plans and critical areas ordinances (CAOs). Comprehensive plans and CAOs now require the use of Best Available Science (BAS), a ruling adopted in July 2000.
The states mitigation strategy focuses mitigation actions primarily among state agencies and establishes overall mitigation strategy for the state. The need for mitigation planning is critical. Since the eruption of Mount St. Helens, disasters have caused direct damage of $1 billion, monies that could have been spent elsewhere. While state agencies identify hazards and assess risk and vulnerability, mitigation planning is local and will be a requirement to access federal disaster mitigation funds in the future.
Chris Parsons (Washington State Office of Community Development)
State emergency managers can now use the Best Available Science (BAS) rule to help identify and plan for geohazards. The BAS rule is required under the Growth Management Act framework for designating and protecting critical areas, such as geologically unstable areas. The new rule provides cities and counties with information about how to recognize valid science and demonstrate how they have included good science when protecting critical areas within their jurisdiction. Local governments are required to update their critical areas to include the best available science ordinances by September 1, 2002.
The BAS rule (WAC 365-195-900 through 925) requires consistency among development regulations for critical areas ordinances (CAOs). Critical areas include wetlands, aquifer recharge zones and areas that are frequently flooded, geologically unstable, or used for fish and wildlife conservation. Under the GMA, you are required to conduct the following 4-step CAO process:
The BAS rule provides criteria for determining what is credible, applicable scientific information for making management decisions.
Shoreline Management Act
Randy Davis (Washington State Department of Ecology)
The Shoreline Management Act (SMA) and resultant shoreline plans are another mechanism available for implementing tsunami-related policy. These plans strive to protect state shorelines by regulating development. State shorelines include all marine waters, rivers and certain streams and lakes and their adjacent lands.
The Department of Ecology in concert with local governments develops shoreline plans for managing state shorelines. NOAA also approves shoreline plans for coastal jurisdictions as an element of the states Coastal Zone Management Program.
The Department of Ecology has technical assistance available. Please contact:
Randy Davis, AICP, WA Dept. of Ecology
PO Box 47775
Olympia, WA 98504
National Flood Insurance Program "V" Zone Requirement
Dan Sokol (Washington State Department of Ecology)
Another mitigation option is the NFIP Velocity or "V" zone designation, a piece of the regulatory framework that covers tsunami risks. FEMA identifies flood areas and local governments that must have flood zone ordinances. These local flood rules are encouraged to be stricter than minimum standards.
Most of these local regulations are more stringent than the 100-year floodplain. Construction standards for velocity, however, are limited to certain areas. Tsunamis could reach "A" zones, which dont have these standards. Further compounding the issue is the lack of licensing for geotechnical engineers. Emergency managers should coordinate tsunami hazard mapping with existing and ongoing flood hazard mapping. State and federal agencies will assist
as requested. The new FEMA Coastal Construction manual is now available. Call 1-800-480-2520.
FEMA Coastal Construction manual. Three volumes in CD 1-800-480-2520.
Chris Jonientz-Trisler (FEMA)
The National Tsunami Hazard Mitigation Program (NTHMP) was formed to help coastal communities reduce their tsunami risk. The tools the NTHMP has developed are also useful to inland coastal communities at risk to tsunamis generated by local faults and landslides.
Tools include inundation maps, an improved warning system, and a variety of other products. Education materials target a variety of audiences including planners, public officials, tourists, schools and the general public. Tools for emergency managers consist of inundation maps, evacuation routes and warning guidance, and community needs assessment surveys. Future work will include more projects dealing with guides for construction and land-use, infrastructure, vegetation, and vertical evacuation. The TsuInfo Alert newsletter facilitates information exchange and is one resource for information about meetings and mitigation
communities assisting them to become more tsunami resistant. Future work will address more long-term mitigation products and recovery planning.
Little tsunami legislation exists. Some is in place in Oregon to address tsunami education and drills for school children and future location of critical facilities on the coast¾ most of which currently are at risk to severe ground shaking and/or tsunami inundation during a local event based on a 1995 study of 47 communities. A 1994 survey of 11 West Coast U.S. communities showed the level of tsunami disaster resistance there could be improved. Since that finding, the NTHMP has worked to accomplish the following:
Shoreside Landslide Mitigation
Bill Laprade (Shannon & Wilson)
Three basic types of landslides occur in Puget Sound: 1) rapid shallow, 2) block fall, and 3) deep-seated. While large, deep-seated landslides dont occur often, they make for very large disasters. For example, the 1997 deep-seated Woodway landslide dropped the shoreface of the bluff back 50 to 60 feet. The slide plane extended down through hard Lawton Clay, breaking into huge blocks, some as big as automobiles. The force of the event sent rail cars into Puget Sound.
In response to the Holiday storm of 1996/97, Shannon & Wilson recently completed a database of landslides in Seattle, one of the largest in the country. The cataloging, done for Seattle Public Utilities (SPU), goes all the way back to 1890 to record data from 1,326 landslides. Drawn from the Department of Design, Construction and Land Use (DCLU), the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), and Shannon & Wilsons files, the database is a valuable tool for CIP and maintenance planning. It can be used to define landslide zones, set landslide policy, and educate the public.
A major finding of the work is that landslides in Puget Sound need a large storm and antecedent rainfall to create the conditions for widespread slope instability. The researchers looked first at steep slope (40%) areas. To their surprise, they found "holes" in areas where they thought landslides should occur. Some areas had many landslides where slide-prone zones had not been recognized. By studying concentrations of landslides, researchers were able to judge which ground should be in and which out of a potential landslide zone. These areas of risk are now incorporated in landslide maps. Certain other spots, such as the north end of Queen Anne, were removed as a
landslide potential area, because they did not have landslide concentrations and other geologic factors indicative of landsliding.
The City of Seattle is now putting this information to use in several ways. SPU is using it to map engineering improvement and define the right kind of mitigation for a particular area. And because the database includes cost information, it can be used to come up with ballpark estimates for mitigation. DCLU is using the information during screening of building and construction permits.
Submarine Landslide Mitigation
Steve Palmer (Washington State Department of Natural Resources)
Puget Sound submarine earthquakes are a significant hazard that requires further study. Historically, these landslides have happened on the deltas of rivers and large streams in the Pacific Northwest. Damage from submarine landslides results from both the movement of the landslide, which can destroy onshore and near-shore structures, and large water waves generated by the moving slide mass. The height of these water waves depends on the volume, geometry, and duration of the slide and the rheologic behavior (how matter deforms when it flows) of the slide mass. Submarine landslides cannot be prevented, and in many instances areas at risk to this hazard must be utilized for port and industrial areas. Consequently, mitigation efforts should be directed at minimizing damage and protecting lives.
Submarine landslides occur when the weight of the landslide mass along a slip surface exceeds the strength of the soil on that surface. They can occur at any time, as submarine slopes are typically at a point of near-instability. The primary triggering mechanisms for static (not caused by earthquake ground shaking) submarine landslides are:
The following table lists wave heights and descriptions of damage from static submarine landslides over the last 100 years in the Pacific Northwest.
|Static Submarine Landslides Pacific Northwest Coast (1894 1994)|
|Fraser Delta, BC||1985||
||none||Nearly undermined lighthouse|
|Seattle, WA||1980s||Previous construction?||none||Undermined sewer outfall|
||25-30 ft||Minor damage docks & mill|
|Howe Sound, BC||1955||
||none||Major damage docks & mill|
||none||700 feet of training wall destroyed|
Strong shaking during an earthquake can trigger submarine landslides by accelerating the landslide mass downslope, consequently increasing its weight, and also by causing liquefaction of soils within the failure. Earthquakes have caused the largest Pacific Northwest submarine landslides. Most of the deaths caused by the 1964 Alaska earthquake were a direct result of submarine landslides. The table below summarizes damage and casualties from earthquake-related submarine landslides in the Pacific Northwest.
|Earthquake-Induced Submarine Landslides Pacific Northwest Coast (1866 1964)|
|1964 Alaska||Valdez||30-40 ft||31 dead||total destruction shore area|
|1964 Alaska||Seward||30 ft||13 dead; 5 injured||total destruction shore area|
|1964 Alaska||Whittier||30-50 ft||13 dead||total destruction shore area|
|1949 Olympia||Seattle||none||None||none. small slide|
|1949 Olympia||Olympia (Cooper Spit)||none||None||none. small slide|
|1946 Vancouver Is||Comox Lake||yes||1 dead||Minor damage to cannery|
|1866 Olympia||Olympia (Cooper Spit)||10-15 ft||10-15 ft||None. Small slide|
Coulter, H. W.; Migliaccio, R. R., 1966, Effects of the earthquake of March 27 1964 at Valdez, Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 542-C, 36 p., 3 plates.
Johns, M. W.; Prior, D. B.; Bornhold, B. D.; Coleman, J. M.; Bryant, W. R., 1986, Geotechnical aspects of a submarine slope failure, Kitimat Fjord, British Columbia: Marine Geotechnology, v. 6, n. 3, p. 243-279.
Kachadoorian, R., 1965, Effects of the earthquake of March 27 1964 at Whittier, Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 542-B, 21 p., 3 plates.
Kayan, R. E.; Barnhardt, W. A.; Palmer, S. P., in press, Geomorphological and geotechnical issues affecting the seismic slope stability of the Duwamish River delta, Port of Seattle, Washington: pre-print of paper to be presented at the American Society of Civil Engineers 5th Technical Conference on Lifeline Engineering, August 12-15, 1999, Seattle, Washington.
McKenna, G. T.; Luternauer, J. L.; Kostaschuk, R. A., 1992, Large-scale mass-wasting events on the Fraser River delta front near Sand Heads, British Columbia: Canadian Geotechnical Journal, v. 29, n. 1, p. 151-156.
Morrison, K. I., 1984, Case history of very large submarine landslide, Kitimat, British Columbia: in IV International Symposium on Landslides, Volume 2, p. 337-342.
Shannon, W. L.; Hilts, D. E., 1973, Submarine landslide at Seward: The Great Alaska earthquake of 1964, Committee on the Alaska Earthquake of the Division of Earth Sciences, National Research Council, published by the National Academy of Sciences, p. 144-156.
Terzaghi, K., 1956, Varieties of submarine slope failures: in Proceedings of the Eighth Texas Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, published by the University of Texas, Bureau of Engineering Research, Austin, Texas, 41 p.
General Policy Change in the Flood Program
Norman Skjelbreia (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers)
The Corps is the public works arm of the federal government. It can play either a post-disaster or proactive role in studying landslide problems. After a flood disaster is official, the Corps does a damage assessment. Flood "authority" is the key. Once granted that authority, the Corps can act quickly. In ten days the Corps built a million-dollar structure in Snohomish following the 1996 flood. When the 1997 snow melt flooding occurred, the Corps, at the request of the governor, offered technical assistance for a landslide inventory and assessment. As a public works agency, the Corps has geotechnical capabilities and offers structural assessment teams. A CD is available from the Corps.
Reducing Earthquake/Tsunami Hazards in Pacific Northwest Ports and Harbors
Robert F. Goodwin (Washington Sea Grant Program)
Nate Wood (Oregon State University College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences)
A three-year collaboration between researchers, university outreach specialists and community planners is studying how to build Pacific Northwest port and harbor communities that are more resistant to earthquake and tsunami hazards. Work includes the development of a GIS-based hazard and vulnerability model, a community-based planning process, and a regional needs assessment survey.
Sponsored by Washington and Oregon Sea Grant Programs and NOAAs Coastal Services Center, the project is developing information technology tools coastal communities can use when creating realistic response-recovery options and seeking new mitigation funding.
A primary goal of the project is to determine how well coastal communities are prepared for and understand the effects of tsunami and earthquake risk and to pinpoint harbor-specific data gaps. Data from the project includes natural hazards/vulnerability analyses for subsidence, liquefaction and landslide potential and maximum tsunami elevation. The groups Web site is a growing forum for public input and a regional educational and training tool for other Pacific Northwest communities.
To date, the study embraces 20 coastal counties and 47 coast towns. Year 1 (1999) was spent designing a model process and testing it in the port and harbor community of Yaquina Bay, Oregon, including the towns of Newport and Toledo. Year 2, now underway, is focused on improving the model and conducting a demonstration project in Washington. Year 3 will concentrate primarily on outreach, training and technical assistance for other Pacific Northwest communities.
Preliminary results from a regional survey suggest that most people believe earthquakes are a greater and more imminent risk to human life and property than tsunamis. Stakeholder input will be merged with technical and scientific input at a "Hazards and Vulnerability Workshop" in Newport, Oregon to be held February 28, 2001. Additional community workshops held in the spring and summer of 2001 will focus on developing mitigation and implementation strategies.
Project investigators recently met with emergency managers and local officials from six mid-sized port and harbor communities in Washington StateEdmonds, Bainbridge Island, Bremerton, Port Orchard, Port Angeles and Port Townsendin preparation for selecting the Washington demonstration project. You can contact the program through Robert Goodwin, Coastal Resources Specialist, Washington Sea Grant Program, School of Marine Affairs, 3707 Brooklyn Ave. NE, Seattle, WA 98105-6715. Or phone, fax or email at 206.685.2452: 206.543.1417 (Fax), firstname.lastname@example.org.
Tsunami Tutorial Nature of the Threat
Brian Atwater (USGS)
Earthquakes in Puget Sound come from three sources: the lower plate (Juan de Fuca plate), the upper plate (North America plate), and the boundary between those plates. On average, large earthquakes arrive at intervals of decades in the lower plate, millenia for the best-known fault in the upper plate (Seattle fault), and centuries for events of magnitude 8 or larger on the plate boundary.
Any of these three kinds of earthquakes can produce tsunamis in Puget Sound. A landslide that set off a tsunami in Tacoma Narrows shortly followed the 1949 earthquake in the lower plate. The earthquake of ca. A.D. 900 caused uplift that triggered a tsunami in central Puget Sound and probably also caused landslide-generated waves in Lake Washington. Tsunamis from plate-boundary earthquakes probably account for sand sheets on Whidbey Island and the head of Discovery Bay.
Atwater, B.F., and Moore, A.L., 1992, A tsunami 1000 years ago in Puget Sound, Washington: Science, v. 258, p. 1614-1617.
Noson, L.L., Qamar, A., and Thorsen, G.W., 1988, Washington State earthquake hazards: Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources Information Circular 85, 77 pp.
Williams, H., and Hutchinson, I., 2000, Stratigraphic and microfossil evidence for late Holocene tsunamis at Swantown marsh, Whidbey Island, Washington: Quaternary Research, v. 54, p. 218-227.
Tsunami Tutorial Emergency Management Issues
Hal Mofjeld (NOAA)
The study of tsunami hazards naturally divides itself up into two parts: 1) the nature of the threat,
discussed by Brian Atwater, and 2) the response to it, addressed in this tutorial. Tsunamis in Puget Sound require understanding the hazard, planning and mitigating for it, and having the warning systems and communication, including education, in place to handle the disaster. Tools for tsunami mitigation currently include (e.g., the NOAA/PMEL/TIME Projects):
These tools require a basic understanding of tsunamis and where they can happen. Areas at risk are shorelines, ports and harbors, coastal rivers and lakes. Tides, weather, and time of day also determine the size of a tsunami in any of these areas. Tsunamis in Puget Sound come from three sources:
Types of Tsunamis in Puget Sound Region
|Local||Local quakes and landslides||1 minute|
|Regional||Cascadia Subduction Zone||0.5 to 3 hours|
|Trans- Pacific||Alaska and Asia||4 hours or more|
Both NOAA (through its Tsunami Warning Centers and NWS/Seattle Forecast Office) and state, county and local EMDs issue tsunami warnings.
Further management information can be drawn from NOAAs Puget Sound Tsunami Model, which uses a 7.6 earthquake on the Seattle Fault to simulate the results of an earthquake-induced tsunami. The model has shown that a 7.6 quake would unleash a dangerous tsunami that would strike the Seattle Waterfront only 2.5 minutes after the earthquake hit. To address the tsunami threat in Puget Sound, emergency managers need to answer the following questions:
Craig Weaver (USGS)
The three earthquake source zones in Puget Sound can release enough force to cause landslides or underwater slumping. And these disasters may not happen immediately after a quake. Some landslides could produce locally damaging tsunamis. Only shallow crustal events, which are rare, have the potential to generate earth movement.
The UW/USGS Seismic Net is a resource to help emergency managers identify where earthquakes occur in all of western Washington. It may be especially useful to managers following deep quakes, which are unlikely to create a tsunami but could cause landslides in a wide area around the epicenter, as happened in a 1949 ground failure that reached from the Cowlitz river to Seattle.
After an earthquake, you can get the following timed sequence of data from the UW/USGS:
SHAKE MAPS are another tool that can be applied as overlay to a map of failure-prone areas. They may be used to identify a subset of slopes with the highest probability of generating a Tsunami. They could also be used as a response template that summarizes ground failure possibilities.
The UW/USGS is developing a real-time data products guide that can show where tsunamis and landslides are expected in Puget Sound.
Tim Walsh (Washington State Department of Natural Resources)
Two different methods of mapping landslidesinventory and analytical¾ are tools now available to local governments. Ideally, the two methods are used in tandem.
Several forces act on a hillslope to cause landslides. Primarily, gravity acts vertically on rocks, making a slope tend to move parallel to the slope or be pinned by forces acting perpendicular to the slope. The Factor of Safety (Fs) is a way scientists measure the resisting and driving forces in a landslide. Shear stress, a driving force, pushes soil parallel along a slope. Shear strength is a measure of the soils ability to resist this pushing. In thinking about landslide movement, Fs equals shear strength/shear force.
Sometimes the same materials can act differently because of circumstances, not just the properties of soil. Thats one of the reasons landslides are much more common during rainy spells. And its one of the reasons scientists analyze slope angle and put that kind of information in slope hazard maps to show susceptibility. A mix of heavy rain, rapid snowmelt and saturated soils trigger landslides as shown by both the historical record and recent events, such as the 1997 Perkins Lane and Magnolia Bluff slides.
More than 100 landslides happened in our region after that kind of weather in 1997. The Woodway slide on January 15, 1997 knocked a freight train into the Sound and on January 19, 1997 killed a family of four in the Rolling Bay area of Bainbridge Island. The Rolling Bay area had been mapped as "unstable" by the Coastal Zone Atlas of 1970, which gives a county-by-county readout of landslide hazard along Washingtons saltwater coastline areas.
Researchers mainly rely on winter-storm-related events to study landslides in Puget Sound. But the region also experienced landslides caused by earthquakes as in the 1949 slide at Salmon Beach in the Tacoma Narrows. The landslide, which occurred 3 days after the 1949 Puget Sound earthquake, generated a 6- to 8-foot tsunami that hit Gig Harbor. The photo on the right shows the effects of this massive slide.
Day 2: Technical Sessions
Emergency managers want the best available information delivered to them as soon as possible. The task ahead is very practical: to find out just how to deliver that information. Technical panels drawn from the earth science and information technology research fields summarized state-of-the-art practice for earthquakes, landslides, tsunamis, merged bathymetry and topography, and HAZUS/GIS products. Panelists were encouraged to explore how their science applies to tsunami and landslide mitigation practice. The following summarizes each panels major conclusions and the audiences response to the technical discussions.
Moderator: Craig Weaver (USGS)
Panelists: Eric Geist (USGS), Tom Brocher (USGS) and Derek Booth (UW)
Moderator: Tim Walsh (Washington Department of Natural Resources)
Panelists: Connie Manson (WA DNR), Bill Laprade (Shannon & Wilson), Hugh Shipman (Ecology), and Rex Baum (USGS)
Other Resources Identified:
Moderator: Vasily Titov (NOAA)
Panelists: Brian Atwater (USGS), Shun-ichi Koshimura (JSPS), Ed Meyers (OGI), Sasha Rabinovich (TCM) and Harry Yeh (UW).
Merged Bathy/Topo Digital Elevation Model (DEM)
Moderator: Ralph Hagerud (USGS)
Panelists: Dave Finlayson (UW), Mike Fisher (USGS) and Cinde Donoghue (NOAA)
Moderator: Ron Langhelm (FEMA)
Panelists: George Graettinger (NOAA), Chris Wayne (ERSI) and Tiffany Vance (NOAA).
List of Acronyms
|BAS||Best Available Science|
|CAO||Critical Area Ordinance|
|CIP||Capital Improvement Project or Program|
|DCLU||Department of Construction and Land Use|
|DEM||Digital Electronic Mapping|
|EMD|| Emergency Management Division (Washington State Military Department)|
Or Emergency Management Districts
|ESRI||Environmental Systems Research Institute|
|FEMA||Federal Emergency Management Agency|
|GIS||Geographical Information System|
|GMA||Growth Management Act|
|GPS||Global Positioning System|
|JSPS||Japan Society for the Promotion of Science|
|NFPI||National Flood Insurance Program|
|NOS||National Oceanographic Service|
|NOAA||National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration|
|NTHMP||National Tsunami Hazard Mitigation Program|
|OGI||Oregon Graduate Institute|
|PMEL||Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory (a division of NOAA)|
|PRISM||Puget Sound Integrated System Model|
|RACE||Rapid Alert of Cascadia Earthquakes|
|SMP||Shoreline Management Plan|
|SPU||Seattle Public Utility|
|TCM||Tsunami Center, Moscow|
|TIME||Center for Tsunami Inundation Modeling Efforts at PMEL|
|TsuInfo||TsuInfo newsletter produced by FEMA|
|USGS||United States Geological Survey|
|UW||University of Washington|
|WSDOT||Washington Department of Transportation|
Puget Sound Tsunami/Landslide Workshop January 23-24, 2001
|Allen||Alston||Emergency Planner||King County Office of Emergency Management|
|Brian||Anderson||Teacher Education Supervisor||Pacific Science Center|
|Brian||Atwater||Geologist||USGS/Quaternary Geology and Earthquake Hazards|
|Eric||Baer||Professor||Highline Community College|
|Steve||Bailey||Director||Pierce County Dept. of Emergency Management|
|Cathleen||Barry||Cartographer||NOAA/Pacific Hydrographic Branch|
|Rex||Baum||Geologist||USGS/National Landslide Hazards Program|
|James||Bela||President||Oregon Earthquake Awareness|
|Eddie||Bernard||Director||NOAA/Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory|
|Matthew||Bernard||CDR Planner||US Coast Guard|
|Marty||Best||Mitigation Officer||WA Emergency Management Division|
|Derek||Booth||Director||UW/ Center for Urban Water Resources Management|
|Tom||Brocher||Geophysicist||USGS/Western Earthquake Hazards Team|
|Eric||Brose||Intern||Kitsap County Dept. of Emergency Management|
|Steve||Brown||Recovery & Mitigation Coordinator||City of Seattle Emergency Management|
|Ted||Buehner||Warning & Coordination Meteorologist||NOAA/National Weather Service|
|Det. Steve||Cain||Detective||City of Bainbridge Island Dept. of Public Safety|
|Sharon||Christopherson||Scientific Support Coordinator||NOAA/ORR/Hazardous Materials Response Division|
|Joe||Ciarlo||Emergency Coordinator||Clallam County Emergency Management Division|
|Mitch||Cline||Major Incidence & Response Coordinator||Thirteenth Coast Guard District|
|George||Crawford||Earthquake Program Manager||WA Emergency Management Division|
|Feruccio||Crocetti||Plans Section Supervisor||WA Emergency Management Division|
|Randy||Davis||Shorelands Planner||WA State Dept. of Ecology|
|Cinde||Donoghue||Bathymetry Expert||NOAA/Coastal Services Center|
|John||Ege||Engineering Geologist||City of Seattle Public Utilities|
|Claudia||Ellsworth||Project Consultant||Project Impact|
|Richard||Fife||Emergency Management Coordinator||WA St. Dept. of Transportation|
|Dave||Finlayson||Graduate Student||UW/Geology/Puget Sound Regional Synthesis Model|
|Mike||Fisher||Marine Geophysicist||USGS/Coastal and Marine Geology|
|Bob||Freitag||Director||UW/Institute for Hazard Maintenance & Research|
|Eric||Geist||Geophysicist/Earthquake &Tsunami Hazards||USGS/Coastal and Marine Geology|
|Frank||Gonzalez||Supervisory Oceanographer||NOAA/PMEL/Tsunami Research Program|
|Roberto||Gonzalez||Regional Director||Emergency Preparedness Canada|
|Bob||Goodwin||Coastal Resource Specialist||UW/Washington Sea Grant|
|George||Graettinger||GIS Coordinator||NOAA/NOS/ORR/Coastal Protection and Restoration Division|
|Barb||Graff||Emergency Preparedness Manager||City of Bellevue Fire Department|
|Lyn||Gross||Director||Emergency Services Coordinating Agency|
|Chuck||Hagerhjelm||Recovery Section Supervisor||WA Emergency Management Division|
|TJ||Harmon||Director||Island County Emergency Management Division|
|Ralph||Haugerud||Geologist||USGS/Puget Sound Landform Studies|
|Roger||Hieb||Training Section Supervisor||WA Emergency Management Division|
|Eric||Holdeman||Manager||King County Office of Emergency Management|
|Steve||Hou||Senior Civil Engineer||City of Seattle Transportation|
|Sheryl||Jardine||Program Assistant||WA Emergency Management Division|
|Jeff||Jensen||Deputy Chief||City Tacoma Fire Department|
|Jerry||Jenson||Exercise Training Officer||WA Emergency Management Division|
|Bill||Johnson||Inspector||Kent Dept. of Fire & Life Safety|
|Bob||Johnson||Chief||City of Auburn Fire Department|
|Chris||Jonientz-Trisler||Earthquake Program Manager||FEMA Region X|
Earthquake & Landslide Hazards
|USGS/Coastal and Marine Geology|
|Gordon||Kelsey||Civil Engineer||Thurston County Roads & Transportation Services|
|Shun-ichi||Koshimura||Tsunami Scientist||NOAA/Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory|
|Don||Krupp||Director||Thurston County Development Services Division|
|Ron||Langhelm||GIS Coordinator||FEMA Region X/Response & Recovery|
|Bill||Laprade||Engineering Geologist||Shannon & Wilson, Inc.|
|Peter||Leon||Policy Analyst||NOAA/Office of Response & Recovery|
|Michael||Lienau||Television Producer||Global Net Productions|
|Jeff||Loewen||GIS Technician||FEMA Region X/Response & Recovery|
|Erika||Lund||Recovery Coordinator||City of Seattle Emergency Management|
|Phyllis||Mann||Director||Kitsap County Dept. of Emergency Management|
|Connie||Manson||Senior Librarian||WA Dept of Natural Resources|
|Steve||Marten||Operations and Training Coordinator||City of Seattle Emergency Management|
|Mike||McCallister||Coordinator||Snohomish County Emergency Management|
|TJ||McDonald||Information Technology Coordinator||City of Seattle Emergency Management|
|Bob||Mead||Hydrologist||Thurston County Environmental Health|
|Max||Messman||Southest Regional Coordinator||WA Emergency Management Division|
|Bob||Minty||Assistant Director / Coordinator||Jefferson County Dept. of Emergency Management|
|Hal||Mofjeld||Tsunami Scientist||NOAA/Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory|
|Jim||Mullen||Director||City of Seattle Emergency Management|
|Ed||Myers||Tsunami Scientist||Oregon Graduate Institute|
|Lester||Olson||Director||Thurston County Emergency Management|
|Steve||Palmer||Geologist||WA Dept of Natural Resources|
|Steve||Palmer||Geologist||WA Dept of Natural Resources|
|Chris||Parsons||Senior Planner||Community Trade & Economic Development|
|Cheryl||Paston||Contract Administration Manager||City of Seattle Public Utilities|
|Catherine||Petroff||Assistant Professor||UW/Civil & Environmental Engineering|
|Sasha||Rabinovich||Tsunami Scientist||Tsunami Center, Moscow, Russia|
|Frank||Reynolds||Inspector||U.S. Dept. of Transportation|
|Stanley||Roe||Personal Secretary to the County Assessor||King County Dept. of Assessment|
|Keith||Ronnholm||President||Remote Measurement Systems, Inc.|
|Robert||Schneider||Emergency Preparedness Manager||City of Redmond Fire Dept.|
|Dave||Schneidler||Manager, Emergency Planning||Port of Seattle Seaport Planning Services|
|Richard||Schroedel||Coordinator||Pierce County Dept. of Emergency Management|
|Roger||Serra||Director||Snohomish County Dept. of Emergency Management|
|Hugh||Shipman||Coastal Geologist||WA Department of Ecology|
|Kristi||Silver||Water Quality Planner||King County Dept. of Natural Resources|
|Terry||Simmonds||Emergency Response Coordinator||Wash. St. Department of Transportation|
|Norman||Skjelbreia||Engineer||U.S. Army Corps of Engineers|
|Randy||Sleight||Chief Engineering Officer||Snohomish County Planning & Development Services|
|Dan||Sokol||Environmental Planner||WA Department of Ecology|
|Bill||Steele||Seismology Lab Coordinator||UW/Geophysics Program|
|Ron||Stephens||Assistant Chief, Prevention & Education||City of Tacoma Fire Department|
|Don||Summers||Section Supervisor||Snohomish County Planning & Development Services|
|Genie||Thompson||Vice President||Bank of America|
|Vasily||Titov||Co-Director||Center for Tsunami Inundation Modeling Efforts|
|Joe||Toland||GIS Specialist||FEMA Region X/Response & Recovery|
|Dee||Totten||Emergency Management Coordinator||City of Mercer Island|
|Kathy||Troost||Research Scientist||UW/Dept. of Geological Sciences|
|Maillian||Uphaus||Programs & Recovery Unit Manager||WA Emergency Management Division|
|Teffany||Vance||GIS Specialist||NOAA/Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory|
|John||Vollmer||Individual Asst. Program Manager||WA Emergency Management Division
|Lee||Walkling||Librarian||WA Dept of Natural Resources|
|Tim||Walsh||Chief Geologist||WA Dept of Natural Resources|
|Chris||Wayne||GIS Expert||Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc.|
|Craig||Weaver||Pacific Northwest Coordinator||USGS Earthquake Hazard Program|
|Kate||Wheatley||Science Education Associate||Pacific Science Center|
|Carla||Whittington||Instructor||Highline Community College|
|John||Willits||Lieutenant||Kent Dept. of Fire & Life Safety|
|David B.||Winandy||Facilities Engineer||NOAA/Western Regional Center|
|Trudy||Winterfeld||Vice Chair||WA St. Emergency Management Council|
|Nate||Wood||Graduate Student||OSU/Oregon Sea Grant|
|Patrick||Yamashita||City Engineer||City of Mercer Island|
|Harry||Yeh||Professor||UW/Civil & Environmental Engineering|
|Jon||Zerby||Director||San Juan County Emergency Management|